Interview With Mets Prospect Hub
So I just had the opportunity to interview Tejesh of Mets Prospect Hub. Unlike the other interviews I've done, this one was done live (Instant Messaging). I met Tejesh on the mets.com forum, and since then I've stayed in contact with him through Aim. Take it for what it's worth, but he probably knows more about mets prospects then any other of these sites on the internet.
A. No, and I really don't think I will. I've always been one of Milledge's biggest supporters, throughout all that high five stuff, etc...and the trade, to me, was basically throwing him away. I think we'll come to regret that trade pretty quickly.
A. lol, no.
Q. So now moving onto players who are still in the system.. Fernando Martinez is the Mets top prospect, and one of the best prospects around baseball.. What kind of career do you think he'll have?
A. It's hard to tell, since prior to this spring, all I had were scouting reports. Seeing him play (even a little) helped. I will say that I love the way he stays in on lefties. His swing, to me, doesn't look like the type which could generate much power, but he is just 19 years old, so power should come. Would anyone be disappointed with a David Wright esque lefty hitter? I see that type of career, high average, good eye, good power.
A. Well, most of the "other" prospects are in the extreme lower levels, and/or 18 years old. I think, mainly because of their performance this spring, Jon Niese and Bobby Parnell will be getting extreme hype this season.
A.Well for one thing he was working on control through the season-which negatively impacted his numbers. Also, because he had one horrific month (May), where he allowed a .974 OPS, every other month was .700 or lower. I think the fact he walked only 2.10 per 9 in 2007, vs 4.50 in 2006, speaks volumes about the step forward he took in 07. I'd look for a big breakout from Niese in 2008.
A. At his peak? Andy Pettite, Barry Zito. Not overpowering with his fastball, pretty devastating curve, good change.
A.It depends on your definition of success. Was I pleased? Absolutely not, and anyone who reads my blog knows it. Do I think the Mets got what they wanted? Yes. So from their point of view, it was a success. From mine, not so much.
A. I don't like it. His stuff (plus fastball, plus slider, and the makings of a plus change) would play ridiculously well for one inning. He's got future closer written all over him.
A. Absolutely, as evidenced by his topping the list of corner infielders on our System Audit in February. I do think he's got to show at least a sign of having a clue versus LHP if he's going to force his way into the Mets plans for 1b post Delgado. I would hope we sign Mark Teixeira, but you never know with prospective FAs (everyone had Carlos Zambrano in our 2008 rotation, that worked out well). I think, at worst, Carp can be a Mike Jacobs type, who mashes righties and would need a platoon partner for lefties. To that end, I expect Carp/Evans to put up insane platoon numbers in
A. He's good. So far, he's shown an ability to hit lefties, something Carp, and Daniel Murphy (a 3b prospect) has not. Duda hit .342/.405/.605/1.010 with 7 2b and 1 HR in 38 ABs vs LHP, and .296/.401/.436/.837 with 12 2b, 2 3b and 3 HR in 179 ABs vs RHP in
A. Yeah, he does. I think the key for him, as it was for Carp, is how he hits lefties. Duda's also shown a good ability to draw walks, with a 98 IsoD in college, and a 99 IsoD in
A. Uhhh...I'll go with Nathan Vineyard for pitching, and Ruben Tejada for hitting.


3 comments:
To add insult to injury Baseball America recently ran an article saying how Guerra has matured and the Twins are impressed with how his curveball has improved and he is even better than they thought he was.
Hey I'm using Supermets on the cbox to talk about Baseball The Man. That is not the real supermets.
What is wrong with you Mike. What is the point of using somebody elses name. Stop talking to us, we don't like you.
Post a Comment